Hyperliquid funding rates: the formula and the real cost
Verified against Hyperliquid docs: Funding and Hyperliquid public info API · by Hyperliquid Academy
Why funding exists
A perpetual future has no expiry, so nothing forces its price to converge with the underlying asset. Funding is the mechanism that does that job. When the perpetual trades above the index, longs pay shorts, which makes being long more expensive and pulls the price back. When it trades below, the flow reverses.
It is not a fee. The exchange takes none of it. It is a transfer between the two sides of the market.
The formula
The documented rate is:
Funding Rate (F) = average premium index (P)
+ clamp(interest rate - P, -0.0005, 0.0005)
The components:
| Component | Value |
|---|---|
| Interest rate | 0.01% per eight hours, paid to shorts |
| Interest rate, hourly equivalent | 0.00125% |
| Clamp on the interest term | plus or minus 0.0005 |
| Payment interval | every 1 hour |
| Cap | 4% per hour |
| Price used for notional | oracle price |
The premium is derived from the impact price difference against the oracle price, so it reflects where the book would actually fill size rather than the last trade.
Two structural details separate this from most venues. Payments are hourly, not every eight hours, so the cost accrues in smaller and more frequent increments. And the notional is computed from the oracle price, which makes the charge resistant to someone pushing the mark price around.
What it actually costs to hold
| Market | Price | 24h | 24h volume | Open interest | Funding / 1h | Max leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | $78,709.00 | -0.53% | $2.24B | $2.7B | 0.00125% | 40x |
| ETH | $2,499.50 | +0.23% | $975.83M | $2.48B | 0.00125% | 25x |
| HYPE | $84.345 | -0.92% | $399.66M | $1.97B | -0.00069% | 10x |
| ZEC | $1,180.80 | +1.76% | $319.06M | $704.18M | 0.00125% | 10x |
| SOL | $104.24 | +0.40% | $143.92M | $585.65M | 0.00078% | 20x |
| PONS | $0.81549 | +12.47% | $116.19M | $122.5M | 0.00125% | 3x |
| PUMP | $0.004419 | +2.36% | $108.62M | $229.74M | 0.00125% | 10x |
| VVV | $23.01 | +30.10% | $77.42M | $53.95M | 0.00881% | 3x |
| XRP | $1.438 | +2.92% | $57.81M | $237.84M | 0.00125% | 20x |
| LIT | $4.88 | +7.10% | $57.27M | $217.43M | 0.00125% | 5x |
| NEAR | $2.378 | +3.06% | $44.26M | $150.48M | 0.00125% | 10x |
| WLD | $0.48074 | +3.62% | $39.4M | $57.73M | 0.00125% | 10x |
Read the funding column as a running cost. A rate that looks negligible per hour compounds: the same rate charged twenty-four times a day, every day, is the number that decides whether a multi-day position is viable.
The comparison that matters
On a position held for an afternoon, the trading fee dominates and funding is noise. On a position held for a week, funding usually dominates and the trading fee is noise. Traders optimise the fee and ignore the funding, which is the wrong way round for anything held overnight.
Our funding cost calculator turns a rate and a holding period into a figure in dollars.
Reading funding as a signal
Funding tells you how the market is positioned, which is information.
Strongly positive means longs are crowded and paying to stay. Crowded longs are the fuel for a long squeeze, because a fall liquidates them into the same direction.
Strongly negative means the reverse.
Near zero means the two sides are roughly balanced and the perpetual is tracking the index closely.
None of this predicts direction. It tells you where the pain would be, which is a different and more useful thing.
Funding arbitrage, honestly
The strategy is straightforward to describe: hold the receiving side of a high funding rate and hedge the price exposure elsewhere, collecting the funding as the payoff.
It is much harder to run than to describe. The rate you are farming moves and can flip while you hold it. The hedge has its own funding, fees and slippage. Both legs need margin, and a liquidation on either turns a market-neutral position into a directional one at the worst moment. And the return is quoted as an annualised rate on a position that rarely survives a year.
Worth understanding. Not a beginner’s strategy, and not passive income.
Where funding is not what you expect
Builder-deployed markets compute the premium slightly differently, using the midpoint of the impact bid and ask against the oracle rather than the standard impact price difference.
Non-crypto markets track underlyings with trading hours. Funding continues while the underlying market is shut, so the cost of holding through a weekend is not the same as holding through a weekday.
Frequently asked questions
How often is funding charged on Hyperliquid?
Every hour, unlike the eight-hour cycle common on centralised venues. Each payment is one eighth of the computed eight-hour rate.
Who pays funding?
Traders pay each other. When the rate is positive, longs pay shorts; when it is negative, shorts pay longs. The exchange takes no cut.
What is the maximum funding rate?
Funding is capped at 4% per hour. That cap is for genuinely extreme dislocations, and typical rates are a tiny fraction of it.
Is funding calculated on the mark price?
No. The notional used for the payment is computed from the oracle price rather than the mark price, which makes the charge harder to manipulate through the order book.
Can I earn funding instead of paying it?
Yes, by holding the side that receives. Doing that while hedging the price exposure elsewhere is the basis of funding arbitrage, which carries its own execution and liquidation risks.
Sources
- Hyperliquid docs: Fundinghyperliquid.gitbook.io
- Hyperliquid public info APIapi.hyperliquid.xyz
We link the primary source for every number on this page. If a figure here disagrees with the official documentation, the documentation is right and we want to know.