- Home
- Comparisons
- The best no-KYC perpetuals exchanges, compared
The best no-KYC perpetuals exchanges, compared
Verified against Hyperliquid docs: Fees and Hyperliquid Terms of Use · by Hyperliquid Academy
The venues
| Venue | Taker | Maker | Best beginner taker | Max leverage | Custody | Identity check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lighter Decentralised exchange, zero-knowledge proofs | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50x | Self-custodial | None |
| Paradex Decentralised exchange, Starknet appchain | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50x | Self-custodial | None |
| Extended Decentralised exchange, Starknet | 0.025% | 0% | 0.025% | 50x | Self-custodial | None |
| Aster Decentralised exchange | 0.04% | 0% | 0.04% | 1,001x | Self-custodial | None |
| Hyperliquid Decentralised exchange, own layer-1 | 0.045% | 0.015% | 0.0432% | 40x | Self-custodial | None |
| edgeX Decentralised exchange, StarkEx rollup | 0.045% | 0.04% | 0.045% | 100x | Self-custodial | None |
| dYdX Decentralised exchange, own chain | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 20x | Self-custodial | None |
| GMX Decentralised exchange, oracle-priced pool | 0.06% | no split | 0.06% | 100x | Self-custodial | None |
| Jupiter Perps Decentralised exchange, oracle-priced pool | 0.06% | no split | 0.06% | 250x | Self-custodial | None |
Every row is self-custodial and verifies nobody. Rates come from each venue’s own published schedule and are dated in the caption; when one changes, the data changes and this page changes with it.
Two columns deserve more attention than the one everyone reads first.
The maker rate. The taker fee is the headline, and it is the wrong number for anyone who rests orders. On a strategy that provides liquidity rather than taking it, the maker column decides the economics. Why the maker side is the largest lever.
Maximum leverage. A high figure is a marketing number, not a recommendation, and it usually applies only to the deepest market and only up to a small position. Reading it as a feature is how accounts get liquidated. What the multiplier actually changes.
What the table cannot show you
Three things decide more than any published rate, and none of them fits in a column.
Depth. A venue with a zero fee and a thin book is more expensive than one with a real fee and real liquidity, because the slippage exceeds the difference many times over. This is the single most common way a fee comparison misleads.
How long it has run. Every venue looks solid until a violent week. A record through one is worth more than any audit or any rate.
Where the volume actually is. Liquidity concentrates, and a market with real open interest behaves differently from the same ticker somewhere quiet.
What you actually give up
This is the part of the question that gets skipped, and it matters more than which venue wins the table.
No KYC means no counterparty, in both directions
On a verified, custodial exchange there is a company holding your assets. That is a risk — it can fail, freeze accounts, or be compelled to. It is also a relationship: someone is accountable, sometimes to a regulator.
On a self-custodial venue there is nobody. No compensation scheme, no ombudsman, no support desk with the power to reverse anything. A transfer to a wrong address is gone. A recovery phrase someone else reads is gone.
That is not a flaw. It is the deal, and it is a good deal for people who understand it. It is a bad surprise for people who assumed some floor existed.
Privacy is the reverse of what people assume. No identity check does not mean anonymous. Every order, fill, position and transfer sits on a public ledger under your address, permanently, readable by anyone. A centralised exchange knows who you are and shows the world nothing; here it is the other way round. The full comparison of the two privacy models.
Tax does not change. Gains are taxable where you live on the same rules as anywhere else. The absence of a form is not an exemption, and the public ledger is a better evidence trail than most exchanges keep. Getting the records out.
Restricted jurisdictions still apply. No identity check is not the same as no restriction. Hyperliquid’s terms name the United States, Ontario and sanctioned jurisdictions, and using the venue asserts you are not covered. The rules by country.
How to choose, honestly
Start from depth, not fees. Whichever venue has real liquidity in the markets you want costs less overall than one with a lower headline rate and a thin book. Check volume and open interest on the specific markets you intend to trade.
Then look at the maker rate, if you rest orders. Then the taker rate, if you cross.
Then check what happens when you need out. Withdrawal mechanics, and whether the venue has ever been tested under stress.
Then apply whatever discount is available before your first trade, because on most of these venues that is a one-time, irreversible opportunity. On Hyperliquid a referral code is 4 % off and cannot be added to a wallet that has traded.
Our position, stated plainly
This site is about Hyperliquid and earns a commission when someone signs up through our link. You should read the table with that in mind, which is exactly why the figures come from each venue’s own published schedule rather than from us, and why the maker rate and the leverage caveat are on this page at all.
The wider comparison includes the verified custodial exchanges, which beat every venue here on depth and lose on custody.
Where to go next
All the venues, including the custodial ones, and what no-KYC actually means for your privacy — which is the assumption most people arrive with and most need to correct.
Frequently asked questions
Which no-KYC exchange has the lowest fees?
The table ranks them by the best entry-tier taker rate a beginner can actually get. Read the maker column alongside it, because on any strategy that rests orders the maker rate matters more than the headline.
Is trading without KYC legal?
It depends where you are. Using a venue that does not verify identity is generally lawful in most places, but trading from a restricted jurisdiction breaches the terms whatever the venue asks for. Tax obligations are unaffected.
Is no KYC the same as anonymous?
No, and on a self-custodial venue it is closer to the opposite. Every fill, position and transfer is on a public ledger under your address, permanently, readable by anyone with no login.
Can these venues freeze my funds?
Not in the way a custodial exchange can, because they do not hold your funds. What they can restrict is access to their own interface, which is a different thing from your balance.
What happens if something goes wrong?
Nothing, in the sense of recourse. No compensation scheme, no ombudsman, no support desk that can reverse a transfer. That is the trade you are making and it should be a deliberate one.
Do I still owe tax?
Yes, in most jurisdictions. Tax follows your gains and your residence, not whether a venue collected documents. The public ledger is a better evidence trail than a centralised exchange keeps.
Sources
- Hyperliquid docs: Feeshyperliquid.gitbook.io
- Hyperliquid Terms of Useapp.hyperliquid.xyz
We link the primary source for every number on this page. If a figure here disagrees with the Hyperliquid documentation, the documentation is right and we want to know.
Keep going
- The perpetual venues worth comparing in 2026Comparisons
- Does Hyperliquid require KYC?Getting started
- Hyperliquid vs Lighter: zero fees versus depthComparisons
- Hyperliquid vs Aster: 1001x leverage in perspectiveComparisons